Re: [問題] 房屋租金幾%才合理?:－2016徵求年菜推薦網路訂購最紅的商家.年菜訂購?台北年菜外送餐廳推薦(年菜)?年菜.今年不想做年菜推薦,網路宅配哪一家好?

Blogtrottr

批踢踢實業坊 home-sale 板

Curious about the benefits of meditation?

In just a few minutes daily, this course will teach you how to relax and relieve stress. Even with a full schedule, you will want to make time for this!

From our sponsors

Re: [問題] 房屋租金幾%才合理?

Dec 7th 2013, 13:57, by newsswen

作者newsswen (新鮮人)

看板home-sale

標題Re: [問題] 房屋租金幾%才合理?

時間Sat Dec 7 13:57:35 2013

※ 引述《ntustee8 (我是大呆瓜)》之銘言： : 今天和朋友討論了一下 : 房屋租金比至少要4.5%~6.5% : 不然根本沒有合理的房租 : 都是全民炒出來的高房價? : 所以意思說假如租金比有4.5%~6.5%是否就比較不用擔心崩盤的危機 : 大家認為租金比要幾%比較合理? : ps.現在台北新北看到最多最多就只有2%~3.5%的投資案子 : 感覺這些都是房價一崩先死這些天真討論租金報酬率，就好像討論股市的EPS一樣真的滿像的，買房收租之於買股收股息宏達電EPS是負的，買了根本收不到股息，股價150塊紡織股雙雄儒鴻EPS 10 聚陽EPS 9.2 股價應該差不多對不對? 前者380塊後者160塊呵呵市場這麼好解讀大家全部解散回家躺著賺不要解讀的跟你不一樣你就把無法解讀的事情解釋為炒作炒作炒作不合理不合理不合理會崩會崩會崩你的世界還真是單純好解釋單一簡單啊 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.81.51.166

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service — if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions